Overtidig svangerskap
Sist oppdatert: Sist revidert:
Sist revidert av:Ingard Løge
Definisjon:
Et svangerskap er overtidig fra dag 294, dvs 42 fullgåtte uker
Forekomst:
Andelen kvinner som føder i uke 42 er rundt 5 % og i uke 43 0,1%
Symptomer:
Overtidighet
Funn:
Ingen spesielle kliniske funn
Diagnostikk:
Anbefales føtometri, ultralyd, CTG og cervixvurdering i uke 41
Behandling:
Avventende med hyppige kontroller, ev. fødselsinduksjon
- Morken N-H, Haavaldsen C, Heimstad R, et al. Overtidig svangerskap. Veileder i fødselshjelp 2020. Norsk gynekologisk forening. www.legeforeningen.no
- Årstabeller for medisinsk fødselsregister 2017. Fødsler i Norge. Folkehelseinstituttet 2018. statistikkbank.fhi.no
- Morken NH, Melve KK, Skjaerven R. Recurrence of prolonged and post-term gestational age across generations: maternal and paternal contribution. BJOG. 2011;118:1630-5 PubMed
- Oberg AS, Frisell T, Svensson AC, Iliadou AN . Maternal and fetal genetic contributions to postterm birth: familial clustering in a population-based sample of 475,429 Swedish births. Am J Epidemiol 2013; 177: 531-7. pmid:23425630 PubMed
- Olesen AW, Basso O, Olsen J. Risk of recurrence of prolonged pregnancy. BMJ 2003; 326: 476. British Medical Journal
- Kortekaas JC, Kazemier BM, Ravelli AC, de Boer K, van Dillen J, Mol B, de Miranda E . Recurrence rate and outcome of postterm pregnancy, a national cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 193: 70-4. pmid:26247484 PubMed
- Stotland NE, Washington AE, Caughey AB. Prepregnancy body mass index and the length of gestation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 378. PubMed
- Whitworth M, Bricker L, Mullan C. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD007058. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007058.pub3. DOI
- Nakling J, Backe B. Adverse obstetric outcome in fetuses that are smaller than expected at second trimester routine ultrasound examination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 846-51. PubMed
- Finucane EM, Murphy DJ, Biesty LM et al. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD000451. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub3 DOI
- Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD001338. pmid: 24924489 PubMed
- de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4. The Cochrane Library
- Middleton P, Shepherd E, Morris J, Crowther CA, Gomersall JC. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD004945. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5. Accessed 07 January 2021. The Cochrane Library
- Wennerholm U-B, Saltvedt S, Wesssbweg A, et al. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial. BMJ 2019; 367: l6131. doi:10.1136/bmj.l6131 DOI
- Rydahl E, Declercq E, Juhl M, Maimburg RD. Routine induction in late-term pregnancies: follow-up of a Danish induction of labour paradigm. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 16;9(12):e032815. PMID: 31848171 PubMed
- Fox NS, Saltzman DH, Roman AS et al. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis. BJOG 2011; 118: 647-54. pmid:21332637 PubMed
- Ingard Løge, spesialist allmennmedisin, redaktør NEL
Tidligere fagmedarbeidere
- Kjell Åsmund Salvesen, overlege Kvinneklinikken St. Olavs hospital. Professor i fødselshjelp og kvinnesykdommer, NTNU
- Per Bergsjø, professor emeritus, dr. med., Universitetet i Bergen. Spesialist i kvinnesykdommer og fødselshjelp, forsker ved Nasjonalt folkehelseinstitutt, Oslo